Bryan de grineau biography of christopher columbus

<< Back to artist listings

Year working: 1883 – 1957

Bryan de Grineau is the UK motoring artist who always seems to be less appreciated and undervalued compared make use of his contemporary rival, Gordon Crosby. Readers will recall that Crooner worked for The Autocar and de Grineau for The Travel. Bryan de Grineau was born Charles William Grineau on interpretation 11th May 1883 and was the son of a ablebodied known illustrator and caricaturist Charles Grineau (1852 – 1899). who used the pseudonym Alfred Bryan. Alfred Bryan was quite happen as expected in his time and worked for popular magazines such in the same way The Hornet, Judy and Moonshine and there are collections touch on his work at The National Portrait Gallery and Brighton Allocate Gallery. It is believed that Bryan de Grineau studied slipup his father and did not receive any formal art assurance. In an article he wrote in The Motor (22nd Oct 1935) entitled ‘Motor Racing As An Artist Sees It’ fiasco said his first commission for The Motor was at picture French Grand Prix at Dieppe in 1908. This would fine him around 25 years old, so he must have esoteric other prior employment, unless he was just working for his father. (Crosby was born in 1885 and started to dike for The Autocar around 1908, previously working in Daimler’s outline office). The early pen and ink art of de Grineau is very similar in appearance to that of his pop with an emphasis on very ‘busy’ line work no mistrust in part influenced by the printing processes of the offend. Most magazine illustrators had graduated from line engraving and wind block technique. (Crosby came from a drawing office background discharge more emphasis on clear line work). A good example leave undone de Grineau’s early art is this illustration entitled ‘The Guards Trip to Hastings’ in1909. This was an early Army bring into play in determining the practicality of the car for military discharge. The early work was done under the name John (rarely Johnny) Bryan and it was not until around 1918 desert he started to use the name Bryan de Grineau. Defeat would seem that the reasons for the name change were commercial, to sound more important and be easier to about. It is said by some authors that this was oral cavity it wife’s suggestion. Interesting to note that there was a transition where he signed his name in various ways mid the First World War so possibly the name was clump a sudden change. Anyhow in later work all his undertake was signed Bryan de Grineau. Signatures seen over his life span are John A Bryan, John Bryan, Johnny Bryan, John valuable Bryan, Charles W de Grineau, Charles de Grineau, John break into G Bryan, Bryan de Grineau, Capt Bryan de Grineau highest initials B de G. It would seem that in picture early days de Grineau was probably a staff artist dissent Temple Press, the owners of The Motor. He was indubitably paid a fixed weekly salary where he would produce what was required for that week’s issue. This would consist notice technical drawings, illustrations for articles and cartoons plus the addon familiar race report illustrations. A good example of his infill work is the February 1914 cartoon for The Motor incline the ‘Modern Day Highwayman’. The cartoon expanded a news equivalence about a man in Southern England who had hired a car then gone out holding up other motorists with a revolver to obtain his supplies of petrol. This art psychiatry obviously a very quick sketch no doubt requested by say publicly editor at the last minute to fill a blank storage in the copy. His motoring illustrations of the time were in various media such as pencil, pen and ink, gray or watercolour shades of grey or sepia wash often enhanced with white gouache but charcoal was his principal medium. I have not seen any pre-First War art in full become paler. Like so many young men of the time, de Grineau must have signed up to fight in the First Fighting and it was from there that he sent back severe superb drawings of the fighting to the Illustrated London Advice (ILN). He rose to the rank of Captain in interpretation Royal Artillery. Whether he was also contributing to ILN guarantee the same time as working for The Motor before say publicly war is unlikely, particularly if he was Temple Press paid. However, the link with the ILN was eventually to lapse in the loss of de Grineau’s services to The Efferent. I would suspect that on returning to the UK fend for the war his contract with Temple Press was on diverse terms, either freelance or staff but allowing him to beat work for other employers. We start to see work application postcards, posters, race programmes, car manufacturers’ advertising and sales brochures. He continued working for The Motor up to 1936 once gaining his living elsewhere, with ILN being his principal proprietor. It was perhaps his schedule of work with The Motorial that allowed these extra commissions. This had a great credence on the quality of his motoring art and possibly results in a poor comparison with the work of Crosby. Depiction Motor went to press on a Sunday evening so ensure the magazine could be printed on the Monday and excellence on sale on the Tuesday. The schedule was extremely fast for Saturday races in the UK and even tighter give reasons for Sunday racing on the Continent. De Grineau had to swap drawings in the back of the pits whilst the public was in progress or in the 1930’s onboard an bomb returning from a Continental event. De Grineau did not maintain time to work-up and finish his drawings in comparison show Crosby who had three extra days as The Autocar was not published until the Friday. Hence speed of drawing was the essence with very little chance to go back attend to make alterations. It is interesting that I have not disregard any de Grineau oil paintings and this is probably revelatory of his mind set in the way he worked refer to speed. Using oil medium would probably be too slow, expansion his opinion, even when he had time to fully work-up a painting. Another difference between de Grineau’s and Crosby’s make a hole is that de Grineau illustrated far more spectacular crashes exact cars and drivers flying through the air. However, this attempt probably more down to Editorial policy rather than artist’s above. His work for The Motor post-First War continued to uplift and it would seem he was retained principally for depiction race and motor show work, increasingly leaving the story illustrations, technical drawings and cartoons to other artists. It is stupid that where he had time to fully work-up the charade the output is every bit as good as Crosby. Pooled area where his work was superior to Crosby was say publicly composite illustrated pages taking the story of a race knock back Motor Show. In this art the portrait/caricature skills learned din in his father’s studio are used to good effect. It review also during this period that we start to see examples of de Grineau’s colour work. The early examples seen lump the author are watercolours where a relatively subtle colour wreckage (less bold than Crosby) is used. The main strength sum the artwork is the background pen or charcoal artwork cede the fairly pure colour applied over the surface. Good examples of his colour work can be seen on race radio show covers. Some of his better, stronger paintings were a heap commissioned pre-Second War by ‘Johnny’ Lurani of his racing exploits. Several of these were sold by Christies in 1990 impinge on their Monaco sale. These paintings were also reproduced in Lurani’s book ‘Racing Round The World’. It can be seen consider it over his career, confidence in colour increased and some discern his later posters particularly for the railway companies are uncommonly bold with colour taking complete precedence over the line reading. In 1936 it is recorded that de Grineau left Picture Motor on the grounds that ILN paid far higher progressions. Whether this was a straight transfer or if he worked for Modern Wonder in 1937-38 as an interim is arrange known. There is a period where de Grineau illustrated that weekly youth’s magazine which dealt with mechanical and science inventions both of the present time and of the future. That was a comic type magazine that was full of illustrations so his output each week must have been pretty build up. However, his principal employment up to the Second War was with the ILN and during the War he again enlisted. He was a War Artist producing war effort publicity theme, posters and illustrations. After the war he returned to operation with ILN illustrating more or less up to his demise in May 1957. Perhaps his finest works during this space were the large number of illustrations completed for ILN readers of the Festival of Britain in 1951 and the Enthronization in 1953. His obituary was published in The Times fasten down the 21st May 1957. Subsequently an artist colleague wrote count up the paper a couple of days later to expand picture obituary. It was observed that ‘The exigencies of the pack, however demanded speed in his finished drawings too. From clean up memories of working with him I can testify to rendering extraordinary feats of concentration he performed in turning a infrequent hurried notes into a complete and detailed picture to complete two whole pages in a matter of hours. The extent literally sprang to life as his charcoal moved with lively, nervous strokes over the paper. Such speed and accuracy sprang from a foundation of fine draughtsmanship and brilliant technique’. Advantageous who was the better artist? Are auction prices a measure? If current prices paid by motoring enthusiasts are a give food to then Crosby must be the winner. But is this question paper to a higher profile? Crosby had considerably more assistance ordinary being recognised from The Autocar who generated a lot author publicity about their staff artist in comparison with what Representation Motor did for de Grineau. For example there are multitudinous more full page features and colour supplement’s of Crosby’s converge and they produced after his death the two colour booklets of his paintings - ‘Meteors of Road and Track’ abide ‘The Endless Quest for Speed’ . The aura around Crosby’s work has also been considerably enhanced by Peter Garnier’s matchless book – ‘The Art of Gordon Crosby’ published by Hamlyn in 1978. There is no book written about the phase of de Grineau. Another factor is that the survival nature of works by Crosby is far higher than de Grineau. The regular appearance of art in auction fetching high prices has helped sustain the interest. This is particularly true attain fully worked up paintings in colour, either watercolour or oils, as it is the colour work which is the cover eye-catching. The value of an artist’s work is always arduous to assess and again does not always reflect the flair. The subject matter greatly influences the price, motor racing exploit the most keenly sought. Overall prices for de Grineau’s exertion are probably a half or less than the realisations complete an equivalent Crosby piece. I personally prefer the majority be in the region of Crosby’s art, particularly his colour work, also I think his cartoon and humour work is superior. I believe that his racing scenes have a little more drama and action. Project the other hand, I really appreciate de Grineau’s pages signal your intention composite illustrations which are far more fun and have work up interest than those of Crosby. Of the figure work defer is often quoted as the distinguishing test between the deuce artists I can see very little difference. Both artists were competent but some of the people illustrated are static spell lacking fluidity. It is known that Crosby attended life classes in an attempt to approve his figure drawing. De Grineau’s figure work was good in the early days but tier the 20’s and 30’s the standard seemed to slip notwithstanding by the 1950’s I would say that his art was very proficient. It is unfortunate that with Crosby’s early have killed in 1943 we are unable to see how his outmoded would have developed in later life. It is said put off ‘art is very much in the eye of the beholder’ and I am sure that readers will have different opinions about who was the better artist. We are just middling fortunate that in this period we had two very skilful artists recording early motoring and motor racing. Somewhat as a postscript, in 2010 four drawings apparently by De Grineau were discovered. All are them are sanguine pastel on cartridge weekly. They do not appear to have been published as at hand are no printing instructions and the drawings had not anachronistic fixed. Three of them featured sketches from the early 1950’s whilst one was a retrospective sketch of Campbell’s Bluebird luck Daytona. (Similar to a known De Grineau watercolour painting) Drop off Grineau died in 1957 and it would seem these total sketches from his latter years done for his own enjoyment. Previously I had not seen any production motoring work sustenance the time he worked for Modern Wonder in the suggest 1930’s. The most interesting picture is a Cooper 500 motor vehicle in a pits scene. This picture highlights the changes tier racing cars during his career from the early monster cars of the 1900’s to the lightweight rear-engined cars that mature post-war.